Transforming health care through research and education.
Leveraging research and education to create a society of healthy communities, where all individuals reach their highest potential for health.
Tamara T. Stone, Ph.D., University of Missouri-Columbia
Seema S. Sonnad, Ph.D., University of Michigan
Sharon B. Schweikhart, Ph.D., The Ohio State University
Clinical practice guidelines can be effective towards reaching common system goals of improved patient care management. Identifying and overcoming institutional and operational barriers can help ensure the successful implementation of guidelines.
Implementing clinical practice guidelines can improve the quality of patient care and positively impact a health care system’s bottom line. To increase the chances of successful implementation, a study by Dr. Stone and her colleagues examines ways that guidelines can be tailored to better meet physicians’ needs and also suggests strategies that encourage guideline acceptance.
The first phase of the study surveyed almost 500 physicians from four health systems when two guidelines (one for acute myocardial infarction and the other for pediatric asthma) were implemented. Researchers asked physicians exactly where they preferred that the guidelines be placed and what specific learning strategies best encouraged them to use the guidelines. They also asked about the content areas, formats, and types of medical evidence that physicians found most useful as they treated patients.
Survey results revealed that, overall, physicians preferred that guidelines be placed on the front of the patient chart, on their personal palm pilots, or in the progress notes. Discussions with colleagues and continuing medical education were identified as most effective in encouraging guideline implementation. During patient treatment, physicians considered guidelines that included immediate treatment flows and strategies aimed at minimizing and encouraging self-management to be the most useful. Clinical guidelines presented in the form of flowcharts, algorithms, and pre-printed orders were also judged more convenient to use when treating patients, and randomized controlled trials were the most persuasive medical evidence that could be included in a guideline.
The following are some of the negative physician viewpoints uncovered by Dr. Sands and her colleagues:
The second phase of Dr. Sands’ study examined how the four participating health systems approached guideline development and implementation. Among their general findings, researchers discovered that successful implementation of clinical guidelines within a system was facilitated by:
Ultimately, guidelines benefit the system, the physician, and the patient by improving the quality of care and controlling costs. Insight into organizational and clinical factors will assist health system leadership overcome barriers and facilitate success when implementing clinical practice guidelines.
©2006-2016 by the American Hospital Association. All rights reserved. Noncommercial use of original content on www.aha.org is granted to AHA Institutional Members, their employees and State, Regional and Metro Hospital Associations unless otherwise indicated. AHA does not claim ownership of any content, including content incorporated by permission into AHA produced materials, created by any third party and cannot grant permission to use, distribute or otherwise reproduce such third party content. To request permission to reproduce AHA content, please click here.